Amd Fx 8350 Vs Intel I5
Price now 205$ Games supported 90% Price at present 551$ Games supported 94% Comparing FX-8350 and Core i5-7600K processor market type (desktop or notebook), architecture, sales commencement time and price. Value for coin To go the index we compare the characteristics of the processors and their cost, taking into account the price of other processors. FX-8350 and Core i5-7600K basic parameters such as number of cores, number of threads, base frequency and turbo boost clock, lithography, cache size and multiplier lock land. These parameters indirectly say of CPU speed, though for more precise assessment you have to consider their test results. Information on FX-8350 and Core i5-7600K compatibility with other computer components: motherboard (look for socket blazon), power supply unit (wait for power consumption) etc. Useful when planning a future reckoner configuration or upgrading an existing one. Annotation that power consumption of some processors can well exceed their nominal TDP, fifty-fifty without overclocking. Some can even double their declared thermals given that the motherboard allows to tune the CPU power parameters. Technological solutions and additional instructions supported past FX-8350 and Cadre i5-7600K. You'll probably need this information if yous require some item technology. FX-8350 and Cadre i5-7600K technologies aimed at improving security, for instance, by protecting against hacks. Virtual machine speed-upwards technologies supported by FX-8350 and Core i5-7600K are enumerated hither. Types, maximum corporeality and channel quantity of RAM supported by FX-8350 and Core i5-7600K. Depending on the motherboards, higher memory frequencies may be supported. General parameters of integrated GPUs, if whatever. Available interfaces and connections of FX-8350 and Cadre i5-7600K integrated GPUs. Maximum display resolutions supported by FX-8350 and Cadre i5-7600K integrated GPUs, including resolutions over unlike interfaces. APIs supported past FX-8350 and Core i5-7600K integrated GPUs, sometimes API versions are included. Specifications and connection of peripherals supported by FX-8350 and Core i5-7600K. Various benchmark results of the processors in comparison. Overall score is measured in points in 0-100 range, college is better. This is our combined benchmark performance rating. We are regularly improving our combining algorithms, but if you lot find some perceived inconsistencies, experience free to speak upwardly in comments section, we usually set up issues quickly. Passmark CPU Mark is a widespread benchmark, consisting of viii different types of workload, including integer and floating point math, extended instructions, compression, encryption and physics calculation. At that place is likewise one separate single-threaded scenario measuring single-core operation. Benchmark coverage: 68% Cinebench R10 is an ancient ray tracing criterion for processors by Maxon, authors of Cinema 4D. Its single core version uses only one CPU thread to render a futuristic looking motorbike. Benchmark coverage: twenty% Cinebench Release x Multi Core is a variant of Cinebench R10 using all the processor threads. Possible number of threads is limited by 16 in this version. Criterion coverage: 19% 3DMark06 is a discontinued DirectX 9 criterion suite from Futuremark. Its CPU part contains 2 scenarios, one dedicated to artificial intelligence pathfinding, another to game physics using PhysX parcel. Benchmark coverage: 19% wPrime 32M is a math multi-thread processor test, which calculates square roots of kickoff 32 million integer numbers. Its issue is measured in seconds, and so that the less is criterion result, the faster the processor. Benchmark coverage: xviii% Cinebench Release 11.five Multi Core is a variant of Cinebench R11.5 which uses all the processor threads. A maximum of 64 threads is supported in this version. Benchmark coverage: 17% Cinebench Release 15 Multi Core (sometimes chosen Multi-Thread) is a variant of Cinebench R15 which uses all the processor threads. Criterion coverage: 13% Cinebench R11.5 is an quondam criterion past Maxon, authors of Cinema 4D. It was superseded past later versions of Cinebench, which use more than modern variants of Cinema 4D engine. The Single Core version loads a single thread with ray tracing to render a glossy room full of crystal spheres and light sources. Benchmark coverage: 13% Cinebench R15 (standing for Release xv) is a criterion made by Maxon, authors of Cinema 4D. It was superseded by later versions of Cinebench, which apply more modern variants of Picture palace 4D engine. The Single Core version (sometimes called Single-Thread) only uses a unmarried processor thread to render a room full of reflective spheres and light sources. Criterion coverage: thirteen% TrueCrypt is a discontinued piece of software that was widely used for on-the-fly-encryption of deejay partitions, now superseded by VeraCrypt. It contains several embedded functioning tests, one of them being TrueCrypt AES, which measures data encryption speed using AES algorithm. Event is encryption speed in gigabytes per second. Benchmark coverage: 13% WinRAR iv.0 is an outdated version of a popular file archiver. It contains an internal speed test, using 'Best' setting of RAR compression on large chunks of randomly generated information. Its results are measured in kilobytes per second. Criterion coverage: 12% x264 Pass 2 is a slower variant of x264 video compression that produces a variable bit rate output file, which results in better quality since the college bit rate is used when it is needed more than. Benchmark result is still measured in frames per second. Benchmark coverage: 12% x264 version 4.0 is a video encoding benchmark uses MPEG 4 x264 pinch method to compress a sample HD (720p) video. Laissez passer i is a faster variant that produces a constant bit rate output file. Its issue is measured in frames per second, which ways how many frames of the source video file were encoded per second. Criterion coverage: 12% Judging past the results of constructed and gaming tests, Technical City recommends Intel Core i5-7600K Should you notwithstanding have questions on option between FX-8350 and Cadre i5-7600K, ask them in Comments section, and we shall answer. Practice yous think we are right or mistaken in our pick? Vote by clicking "Like" push button near your favourite CPU. We believe that the nearest equivalent to FX-8350 from Intel is Core i7-4770T, which is most equal in speed and lower by 2 positions in our rating. Here are some closest Intel rivals to FX-8350: We believe that the nearest equivalent to Core i5-7600K by AMD is Ryzen Embedded V1605B, which is slower by ane% and lower by 7 positions in our rating. Here are some closest AMD rivals to Core i5-7600K: We picked several like comparisons of processors in the same market place segment and performance relatively close to those reviewed on this page. Here you can encounter how users rate the processors, too as charge per unit them yourself. Charge per unit AMD FX-8350 on a scale of 1 to five: Rate Intel Core i5-7600K on a scale of 1 to 5: Here yous tin can enquire a question nigh FX-8350 or Core i5-7600K, agree or disagree with our judgements, or report an mistake or mismatch. Graphics settings Screen resolution FPSAMD FX-8350 vs Intel Cadre i5-7600K
General info
Place in functioning rating 1080 960 Value for coin i.85 3.85 Market place segment Desktop processor Desktop processor Series AMD FX-Series (Desktop) Intel Cadre i5 (Desktop) Architecture codename Vishera (2012−2015) Kaby Lake (2016−2019) Release date 23 Oct 2012 (9 years ago) 3 Jan 2017 (five years ago) Launch toll (MSRP) no data $242 Price now $205 $551 (2.3x MSRP) Technical specs
Concrete cores viii (Octa-Core) 4 (Quad-Core) Threads viii 4 Base of operations clock speed four GHz 3.8 GHz Boost clock speed 4.two GHz iv.ii GHz L1 cache no data 64K (per core) L2 cache 8192 KB 256K (per core) L3 cache no information 6 MB (shared) Chip lithography 32 nm xiv nm Die size 315 mmtwo no data Maximum core temperature 61 °C 100 °C Maximum case temperature (TCase) no data 72 °C Number of transistors 1,200 million no data 64 bit support + + Windows 11 compatibility - - Unlocked multiplier 1 + P0 Vcore voltage Min: 1.2 Five - Max: 1.four V no data Compatibility
Number of CPUs in a configuration 1 1 Socket AM3+ FCLGA1151 Thermal design power (TDP) 125 Watt 91 Watt Technologies and extensions
Instruction ready extensions MMX, SSE, SSE2, SSE3, SSSE3, SSE4.1, SSE4.2, SSE4a, AMD64, AMD-V, AES, AVX, CLMUL, CVT16, EVP, FMA4, XOP, Turbo Core, HT3.1 Intel® SSE4.i, Intel® SSE4.2, Intel® AVX2 AES-NI + + FMA + no data AVX + + vPro no data + Enhanced SpeedStep (EIST) no data + Turbo Heave Technology no data 2.0 Hyper-Threading Technology no information - TSX no data + Idle States no data + Thermal Monitoring no data + SIPP no information - Security technologies
EDB no data + Secure Key no data + MPX no data + Identity Protection no data + SGX no information Yeah with Intel® ME OS Guard no data + Virtualization technologies
AMD-Five + + VT-d no data + VT-ten no data + EPT no data + Memory specs
Supported retentivity types DDR3 DDR3, DDR4 Maximum memory size no data 64 GB Max retention channels no data 2 Maximum memory bandwidth no data 38.397 GB/s ECC memory back up no data - Graphics specifications
Integrated graphics bill of fare no data Intel Hard disk drive Graphics 630 Max video memory no data 64 GB Quick Sync Video no data + Clear Video no data + Clear Video HD no data + Graphics max frequency no information ane.15 GHz InTru 3D no data + Graphics interfaces
Number of displays supported no data 3 Graphics image quality
4K resolution support no data + Max resolution over HDMI 1.4 no data 4096x2304@24Hz Max resolution over eDP no data 4096x2304@60Hz Max resolution over DisplayPort no data 4096x2304@60Hz Graphics API back up
DirectX no data 12 OpenGL no data 4.5 Peripherals
PCIe version n/a 3.0 PCI Express lanes no information 16 Benchmark performance
Overall score
Gaming performance
Advantages and disadvantages
Performance rating 5.73 vi.62 Novelty 23 Oct 2012 3 January 2017 Base clock speed 4000 3800 Bit lithography 32 nm 14 nm Thermal pattern ability (TDP) 125 Watt 91 Watt
Cast your vote
Competitors of FX-8350 by Intel
Competitors of Cadre i5-7600K by AMD
Similar processor comparisons
User rating
Questions and comments
Source: https://technical.city/en/cpu/FX-8350-vs-Core-i5-7600K
Posted by: powersidowed.blogspot.com
0 Response to "Amd Fx 8350 Vs Intel I5"
Post a Comment